Login




Emodialisi

RELATIOSHIP BETWEEN VASCULAR ACCESS (VA) TRIAGE AND CLINICAL EVENTS IN HAEMODIALYSIS (HD)

poster

Introduction

Vascular access type (AVF vs CVC) is known to affect morbidity and mortality in haemodialysis patients.

Besides VA type, also its performance may be relevant but it is not a routinely evaluated parameter.

We developed a system of VA triage to be representative of its performance on a monthly basis.

We report here on the relationship between this VA triage and clinical events in HD patients (admissions and deaths).

Methods

For all patients attending our Unit, nurses recorded on an electronic data sheet weights, blood pressure, heart rate, blood flows, VA pressures, symptoms and clots of each haemodialysis session and KT/V once monthly (Figure 1).

Pathologic values of these parameters contribute to generate a score that, according to empiric thresholds, results in a VA triage (green, yellow, red. Figure 1).

Between Jan/1th/2014 and Dec/31th/2015 we recorded all clinical events (hospital admissions and deaths) of those patients whose VA had been triaged for at least 3 consecutive months.

For the purpose of this study we then calculated the average triage of each patient recorded during its available follow-up. AVF and CVC scores were calculated separately.

Results

We had records of 111 patients, pertinent to 62 AVF and 49 CVC, followed-up for 18±7 months.

Hospital admissions were 170 and lasted 16±26 days. Twelve patients died.

Prevalence of events was greater in CVC as compared to AVF patients (75% vs 51%, p<.02).

On the basis of their average VA triage we recognized three groups of patients: green, yellow and red. The prevalence of events was different in these groups:

green =36%, yellow = 68% and red = 100% (p<0.001),

We confirmed a different prevalence of events in the subgroup with AVF (green =30%, yellow = 62%, red = 100%; p<0.01) but not in patients with CVC.

Notably, age, dialysis duration and diabetes were not different among the three groups. (Figure 2)

Discussion and Conclusions

VA performance, whose clinical relevance is undisputed, is mostly evaluated when malfunctioning or, at the best, through periodic Doppler assessment.

We developed here a system that records the variability of the performance of VA and generates a triage that might be helpful to attract the attention of shifting nurses and physicians on a limping access.

Records in our population confirmed that VA type is a risk factor for morbidity in HD patients.

In addition, we had evidence that also the performance of VA was associated with a different risk of clinical events in patients on hemodialysis.

Therefore, a triage system like the one we used, evaluating qualitative VA performance, could be regarded as a possible sensor of VA adequacy and be helpful to recognize patients at increased clinical risk.

In particular our AV triage seems to be more sensitive for AVF than for CVC.

release  1
pubblicata il  05 ottobre 2016 
da Muci M.L, Tartaglione L., Rotondi S., Carbone L. and Mazzaferro S.
(Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, ICOT Hospital, Polo Pontino Sapienza University of Rome)
Parole chiave: emodialisi
Non sono presenti commenti
Figure

Per inserire una domanda, segnalare la tua esperienza, un tuo commento o una richiesta di precisazione fai il login con il tuo nome utente e password.

Se non lo sei ancora puoi registrati partendo da qui.

Realizzazione: TESISQUARE®

Per assistenza scrivere al Supporto Tecnico